6 comments on “Movie Review: Gods and Generals (2003)

  1. I have been scouring the internet for years about the G&G Director’s Cut. I love both of Mr. Maxwell’s Civil War films very much and the news of the forthcoming extended versions is awesome. I had the very distinct privilege to see the rough director’s cut back in 2004 at The San Antonio Independent Christian Film Festival http://www.saicff.org/festival/program/events/?year=2004 .
    It was a great film and I think it is way better than the cut down theatrical version. I’m sure there are some parts that are in need of cleaning up. In the cut I saw there were some shots that had unfinished visual effects such as the scene of Joshua Chamberlain overlooking Fredricksburg had a very rough green screen shot that was not keyed out much at all among other rough areas in the audio and editing. This leads me to believe that the version I saw was the earlier rough cut and perhaps in the final DVD a few things might be cut down and refined, though I hope not entire scenes as the whole thing is magnificent. I know there have been rumors for years about its release but now it seems to be a reality! Thanks for breaking the news on your blog. I really liked your interview with Brian Mallon as well.
    ~ A. Vawser

  2. Pingback: “Gods and Generals” Director’s Cut World Premiere Information « From New York to San Francisco

  3. Pingback: Movie Review: The Extended Director’s Cut of “Gods and Generals” « From New York to San Francisco

  4. Overall, I was disappointed with this film. It is unfair to blame the film’s financial failure entirely on politics. I think the main reasons the film did not do well include it being aimed at Civil War buffs instead of a mainstream audience the way “Gettysburg” was and suffering from a poorly written script. As others have stated, “Gods and Generals” would have definitely benefited from being a miniseries instead of a feature film. I also think the film would have been better received if it had been more faithful to Jeff Shaara’s novel, in particular the four way narrative of Lee, Jackson, Chamberlain, and Hancock (rather than focusing some much on Jackson and adding additional characters and subplots). I can remember reading the novel a couple weeks before the film came out in 2003 and then after seeing it being disappointed that Brian Mallon did not have a larger role as Hancock.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s