Rangers Should Trade Frolov to Ottawa, Bring Kovalev Back for Third Stint

Before you break out the torches and pitchforks, let me just state that this is purely a trade proposal on my part. It is not a rumor, nor is it speculation. So you have been forewarned that this is not being peddled as inside information in any way, shape, or form.

The bottom line is, the New York Rangers desperately need some secondary scoring if they are to continue this surprising chase for a post-season berth and develop some consistency. Alex Frolov, the one-time 35 goal scorer, was brought here to ride second fiddle to Marian Gaborik, and provide either scoring and stability on the top line, or depth on the second, but thus far, he has failed pretty horrendously at both, finding himself with time on the fourth line, and limited shifts in certain games. Though he and Tortorella insist there are no problems between them, and that all is well in the locker room, one must wonder what the general feeling towards Frolov is, after he told a Russian newspaper that he is not happy with his ice time. My response to that, what have you done to earn any significant ice time? In 31 games this season, Frolov has only five goals and six assists and has not developed chemistry with any teammates he has been paired with.

Meanwhile, in Ottawa, former and two-time Ranger Alexei Kovalev has complained to the papers that he feels he is not getting a chance to prove himself, and feels he is being made a scapegoat for the team’s struggles. This will not make him sit well with head coach Cory Clouston and Kovalev could be on the move soon if he does not pick up his game. The veteran 37-year-old has seven goals and seven assists in 31 games played. He has performed slightly better than Frolov, but only because he has played better on the powerplay.

My proposal would be an even swap of the two wingers. Neither fits in with their current team, neither is in a good light with their coach, and both are testing fans’ patience. Neither player had immense expectations coming into this season, but even so, they have failed to live up to what they were expected. Kovalev may have an excuse, after all, he is 37-years-old and has played in 1259 games. But Frolov has no excuse. One can argue that he is not getting playing time with Gaborik, therefore his point totals get deflated, but he did not perform particularly well when he played on the same line as him. He has played with every trio of forwards that could be possibly assembled in the last month and has only one goal in thirteen games, and no assists.

The only reason why I would advocate trading for Kovalev is because he is a free agent after this season, like Frolov, and perhaps, for the both of these players, a change of scenery would do them some good. Kovalev would definitely help the Rangers’ struggling powerplay and he may even be able to get some time with Gaborik, because he does have a pretty good passing eye. Frolov could then provide some size and strength up front for Ottawa who has been struggling in the goals-scored department.

Because Kovalev makes $5 million, and Frolov only $3 million, the Rangers would have to attach another player. Todd White makes $2.375 million and actually had success in Ottawa for four seasons, including hitting the 20-goal mark twice. He has only one goal in 14 games, but has not had much playing time to prove himself. Economically speaking, this deal would work for both teams, the only question is, would the Rangers and Senators be willing to deal struggling players hoping that a change of scenery will benefit the team? There really would not be any harm done for either team, because everyone I propose is an unrestricted free agent after this season.


3 thoughts on “Rangers Should Trade Frolov to Ottawa, Bring Kovalev Back for Third Stint

  1. gregmchugh302@hotmail.com

    Great… Get one Russian who can’t score in a ranger jersey, for a has been russian who can’t score in a ranger jersey….throw in a Messier jersey and a box of pop corn ….. Might be worth it!

  2. Jumbo


    Despite the fact that among active players only Teemu Selanne has more career hat tricks than Kovalev, I don’t advocate bringing him back for a third stint. He never really played to his potential in his earlier days and his greatest success was when he played alongside Mario Lemieux in Pittsburgh. It is a mystery why most Russian players don’t play well for the Rangers, and Kovalev is Exhibit A. But I guess he can’t be worse than Frolov and your proposed deal helps the Rangers out a small amount in terms of the salary cap.

    I’ve seen some talk about the Rangers acquiring Brad Richards from Dallas. I don’t think that would work either. Richards had success as a second-line center in Tampa with Vincent Lecavalier on the top line, but I don’t see Richards at a legitimate first-line center. A top line of Richards-Kovalev-Gaborik sounds good on paper but may not work on the ice.

    It seems not long ago that Neil Smith took Kovalev as a first-round draft pick, now he is the last remaining active player who was on the 1994 Cup winning team.

    1. I would rather have Richards, first and foremost, because Richards is a center and that is really what this team needs. I don’t think Frolov would fetch this team a decent center, which is why I proposed this deal.

      To the people who don’t want him, how would Kovalev hurt the Rangers more than Frolov?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.